<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://bioinfo-core.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Core_Facility_Metrics</id>
	<title>Core Facility Metrics - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://bioinfo-core.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Core_Facility_Metrics"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bioinfo-core.org/index.php?title=Core_Facility_Metrics&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-14T19:05:28Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://bioinfo-core.org/index.php?title=Core_Facility_Metrics&amp;diff=9856&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Simon andrews: Initial creation of list of metrics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bioinfo-core.org/index.php?title=Core_Facility_Metrics&amp;diff=9856&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2011-11-10T16:00:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Initial creation of list of metrics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[11th_Discussion-7_November_2011 | recent public call]] one of the topics which was raised was how feasible it was to quantitatively assess the output of a core facility.  One of the actions from this call was that we would try to put together a list of metrics which could be used to measure how well a core was performing and that this might be useful for both helping to assess your own core, or to compare your core with others to see how you compare.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Metrics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Background Information===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This information doesn&amp;#039;t measure the core facility, but would help other people seeing the later metrics to put them in some kind of context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Number of members of staff&lt;br /&gt;
## Number of general bioinformaticians&lt;br /&gt;
## Number of programmers&lt;br /&gt;
## Number of database administrators&lt;br /&gt;
## Number of statisticians&lt;br /&gt;
## Number of computer technicians&lt;br /&gt;
## Number of admin/management staff&lt;br /&gt;
# Method of support (chargeback / grants / core funded etc)&lt;br /&gt;
# Number of staff to support&lt;br /&gt;
## Ratio of biologists : bioinformaticians&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Core Metrics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These metrics could be calculated over any arbitrary period of time.  They could be applied to a facility as a whole or to specific individuals or groups of individuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Proportion of work hours attributable to:&lt;br /&gt;
## Billable or Assignable work for biologists&lt;br /&gt;
## Maintainance of existing facilities or tools&lt;br /&gt;
## Development of new facilities or tools&lt;br /&gt;
## Developing, Presenting or Receiving training&lt;br /&gt;
## Other enrichment activities (reading / writing papers, attending conferences etc)&lt;br /&gt;
## Administration&lt;br /&gt;
## Other activities&lt;br /&gt;
## Unaccounted hours&lt;br /&gt;
# Number of jobs completed per day per person&lt;br /&gt;
# Average number of active jobs per person&lt;br /&gt;
# Average number of pending jobs per person&lt;br /&gt;
# Average elapsed time on active jobs&lt;br /&gt;
# Average length of time to start working on a job&lt;br /&gt;
# Average length of time to complete a job (elapsed time)&lt;br /&gt;
# Average length of work on a job (billable or active time)&lt;br /&gt;
# Ratio of active time to elapsed time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working out how best to summarise job lengths might be tricky.  In our core I know that there are certain jobs which will drag on for months whilst most jobs are completed within a day, so a simple mean would not be appropriate.  Perhaps expressing the results as box-whisker plots (maybe on a log time scale) would give a realistic impression).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Simon andrews</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>